Few people in the world are as qualified to talk about medical science as it pertains to Covid-19 as Martin Kulldorff. The Harvard professor, epidemiologist, and biostatistician has more medical knowledge and better credentials than all of the censorship personnel at Twitter combined. But at Twitter, science is only as important as a tool to drive the narrative passed down to them by globalists bent on perpetual fear amongst the populace.
Kulldorff made a science-backed, common sense statement on Twitter that got him locked out of his account until he willingly bowed down to Twitter’s false gods and removed the Tweet.
Here’s what he said: “Naively fooled to think that masks would protect them, some older high-risk people did not socially distance properly, and some died from #COVID19 because of it. Tragic. Public health officials/scientists must always be honest with the public.”
Hi Martin Kulldorff, you may be a Harvard epidemiologist, but we at Twitter DGAF. Your account has been locked because you dared to suggest masks are not God’s gift.
Have a great weekend!
— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) May 15, 2021
Breaking: world-renowned Harvard professor, biostatistician, and epidemiologist @MartinKulldorff, one of world's most qualified, locked by @Twitter for opinion on masks one day after CDC abruptly reversed mask guidance.
Almost like Big Tech trying to be on wrong side of history. https://t.co/I1akkKomxX
— Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) May 15, 2021
This move by Twitter is clearly agenda-driven, and that should absolutely terrify anyone who uses the “platform.” What Kulldorff posted is 100% fact-based. You won’t find a single medical scientist in the world who would deny it if forced to be honest. We’ve seen instances on television and throughout social media in which masked people, including the elderly, are hanging out and acting almost like normal because they felt the face diapers they wore would protect them.
How many of those people were infected as a result? How many who got infected died? It’s an impossible question to answer… unless you’re Twitter in which case the nefarious agenda they’ve been charged to promote has overtaken all other considerations, including medical science itself. One does not have to be a conspiracy theorist to see something bad is happening behind the scenes.
It’s not just Twitter. The CDC, which is supposed to be apolitical but has proven itself to be very political throughout the pandemic, did the right thing by lifting their face mask guidelines this week. But the White House was quick to point out that the decision came from them, not government itself. According to The Post Millennial:
In a back and forth with a Fox News reporter, the Press Secretary insisted that the timing of recent changes to mask-wearing requirements came at the direction of medical experts, not politicians.
During a press briefing on Friday, Psaki was asked by Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy about the timing of the CDC’s announcement the day before, wherein they stated that vaccinated people no longer have to wear masks in certain situations. “Did somebody … in the Biden administration update this guidance for political reasons?”, Doocy asked.
Psaki’s answer was simple; “No.”
She went on to say that CDC director Dr. Walensky and the rest of her team have been “constantly reviewing the data to ensure that they can provide accurate and up to date guidance to the American people.”
One might read into this as a way for the White House to maintain some degree of control over what happens with face masks while still being able to reduce some of the flak they’ve been getting over them. It also gives them an out so unhinged leftists won’t scream in terror at the thought of being forced to remove their own masks.
Nevertheless, the leftists were out in full force trying to stop this small allowance of freedom from proceeding. According to BizPacReview:
Progressives voiced their dismay following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated guidance that vaccinated people no longer need to wear masks indoors or outdoors.
Progressives and medical experts immediately criticized the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) mask guidelines, arguing that the alteration was extreme and would be harmful to certain parts of the population. Others said the new guidance is confusing and disincentivizes people to get vaccinated.
“The CDC has done an about-face that’s shockingly abrupt: it’s confusing & could actually disincentivize vaccines,” Dr. Leana Wen, a George Washington University public health professor, tweeted after the announcement Thursday.
“Yes, vaccinated people are well-protected and not a threat to others,” she said in a later tweet. “But do we trust that the honor system—won’t unvaccinated people pretend to be vaccinated & stop wearing masks?”
The new guidance might endanger people who cannot receive the vaccine like children and immunocompromised individuals, Wen, who is also a CNN medical analyst, wrote in a Washington Post editorial Friday. Instead, the CDC should’ve slowly changed its guidance over an extended period of time, she said.
“This is too risky in my opinion,” tweeted Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding, an epidemiologist and Federation of American Scientists senior fellow, in response to the CDC announcement. “Asymptomatic transmission efficacy is only in the 70s-80s even for the best vaccines. Much lower for others and for some variants.”
Several other Twitter users criticized the decision and vowed to continue wearing masks despite being vaccinated. Others responded the White House tweet about the new guidance, saying it “will get people sick” and that it was “foolhardy.”
The left loves to say, “Follow the science!” But they’re not talking about REAL science. They’re talking about the political science that’s driving face masks, lockdowns, and vaccines. It’s all Kabuki Theater.
‘The Purge’ by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us
Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.
For the last few months, NOQ Report, Conservative Playbook, and the American Conservative Movement have appealed to our readers for assistance in staying afloat through Covid-19 lockdowns. The downturn in the economy has limited our ability to generate proper ad revenue just as our traffic was skyrocketing. We had our first sustained stretch of three months with over a million visitors in November, December, and January, but February saw a dip.
It wasn’t just the shortened month. We expected that. We also expected the continuation of dropping traffic from “woke” Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but it has actually been much worse than anticipated. Our Twitter account was banned. Both of our YouTube accounts were banned. Facebook “fact-checks” everything we post. Spotify canceled us. Medium canceled us. Apple canceled us. Why? Because we believe in the truth prevailing, and that means we will continue to discuss “taboo” topics.
The 2020 presidential election was stolen. You can’t say that on Big Tech platforms without risking cancellation, but we’d rather get cancelled for telling the truth rather than staying around to repeat mainstream media’s lies. They have been covering it up since before the election and they’ve convinced the vast majority of conservative news outlets that they will be harmed if they continue to discuss voter fraud. We refuse to back down. The truth is the truth.
The lies associated with Covid-19 are only slightly more prevalent than the suppression of valid scientific information that runs counter to the prescribed narrative. We should be allowed to ask questions about the vaccines, for example, as there is ample evidence for concern. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” in order to want answers about vaccines that are still considered experimental and that have a track record in a short period of time of having side-effects, including death. One of our stories about the Johnson & Johnson “vaccine” causing blood clots was “fact-checked” and removed one day before the government hit the brakes on it. These questions and news items are not allowed on Big Tech which is just another reason we are getting canceled.
There are more topics that they refuse to allow. In turn, we refuse to stop discussing them. This is why we desperately need your help. The best way NOQ, CP, and ACM readers can help is to donate. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well. We are on track to be short by about $4100 per month in order to maintain operations.
The second way to help is to become a partner. We’ve strongly considered seeking angel investors in the past but because we were paying the bills, it didn’t seem necessary. Now, we’re struggling to pay the bills. We had 5,657,724 sessions on our website from November, 2020, through February, 2021. Our intention is to elevate that to higher levels this year by focusing on a strategy that relies on free speech rather than being beholden to progressive Big Tech companies.
During that four-month stretch, Twitter and Facebook accounted for about 20% of our traffic. We are actively working on operating as if that traffic is zero, replacing it with platforms that operate more freely such as Gab, Parler, and others. While we were never as dependent on Big Tech as most conservative sites, we’d like to be completely free from them. That doesn’t mean we will block them, but we refuse to be beholden to companies that absolutely despise us simply because of our political ideology.
We’re heading in the right direction and we believe we’re ready talk to patriotic investors who want to not only “get in on the action” but more importantly who want to help America hear the truth. Interested investors should contact me directly with the contact button above.
As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report going.