A study from Bangladesh touted by advocates of mask mandates already has been accused of design flaws and overstated findings, and now a researcher is spotlighting the minuscule infection differences between “treatment” and control groups randomized across 600 villages.
University of California Berkeley professor Ben Recht, who studies machine learning, pointed out in an essay that in a total study population of 342,126 adults, 1,106 people in the control group tested positive, compared to 1,086 in the treatment group, Just the News reported .
“I have a hard time going from these numbers to the assured conclusions that ‘masks work’ that […]
Read the rest of this story here: www.wnd.com
