Candace Owens dropped a bombshell on her podcast last week, sharing screenshots of private messages from Charlie Kirk dating back to April 6, 2018. In them, the Turning Point USA founder expressed a deep-seated fear that his activism would lead to his demise.
“If I tell you the true prophecy I know in my gut it’s really sad,” Kirk wrote. “But I hope its wrong.”
“Anyway I am not sure if I will live to see the end of this revolution.”
“Since the beginning of TPUSA I knew in my gut that I might get wiped out at any time,” he added. “I cannot explain it.”
“But I dream about it all the time. Like all the time.”
“Not really afraid of it but I’m just telling you what I know to be true.”
“I might be Moses tho. I might not see this whole thing through lmao.”
These words took on a grim reality when Kirk was gunned down on September 10, 2025, during a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University. Shot through the neck in front of a packed crowd, his death sent shockwaves through political circles.
Owens, who parted ways with Kirk professionally after her views veered too far for some at TPUSA, didn’t stop at the old texts. She followed up with a pointed warning on her show: those “who betrayed Charlie” should step forward now.
Fresh leaks have only deepened the mystery. Just days before his death, Kirk reportedly vented frustration in messages about pressure from pro-Israel donors and his intent to distance himself from that cause. One text allegedly read: “no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.” Another expressed irritation with Jewish donors influencing his work.
Reports indicate Kirk turned down a substantial offer from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to fund TPUSA, a decision he feared might invite trouble. His close associate Andrew Kolvet pushed back, insisting TPUSA takes no foreign money and that Israel played no part. Yet, Owens has declared open “war” on TPUSA and anyone around Kirk that day, accusing them of complicity.
Online, theories abound that this wasn’t random violence but an orchestrated hit. Some point to Mossad involvement, citing Kirk’s security ties to former Israeli operatives and unusual details like a distraction during the shooting. Others note Israel’s quick reporting of the death and preemptive denials, suggesting an inside job with foreign fingerprints. FBI Director Kash Patel’s reluctance to dive deep has only stoked doubts about a cover-up.
Kirk’s early instincts about not surviving his “revolution” now hang over these revelations like a shadow. With law enforcement tight-lipped and leaks piling up, questions linger about who really pulled the strings—and why a voice challenging powerful interests got silenced.
