Ah, those pesky election deniers. Despite years of Democrat claims that elections and voting machines were untrustworthy, it has become verboten to question the Holy Grail of US voting systems since the sketchy Biden win. Yet there is nothing holy about election interference – Donald Trump was criminally tried for trumped-up claims that a mischaracterization of a payment (that did not alter his tax liability) constituted “election interference.” But what about Hunter Biden’s laptop and Tony West’s alleged improprieties?
Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid $113,000 to fabricate a “dossier” implicating Donald Trump in Russian collusion, which the piranha propaganda press devoured gleefully and distributed widely:
The Clinton campaign and the DNC paid more than $1 million combined to powerful Democratic law firm Perkins Coie, which engaged Fusion GPS to dig for dirt on Trump. Fusion GPS, in turn, hired former British spy Christopher Steele — whose namesake dossier included allegations that Russian security services possessed a tape of Trump in a Moscow hotel room with prostitutes who were supposedly urinating on a bed where the Obamas had previously stayed.
The FEC said Clinton and the DNC claimed the money given to Perkins Coie to hire Fusion GPS was reported on disclosure forms as having gone toward “legal advice and services” rather than opposition research.
Election interference? Nah…. How dare anyone undermine democracy by spreading such hateful disinformation as saying that Hillary improperly tried to influence an election? (satire)
Had the American public known of the bona fides of Hunter’s laptop, the 2020 election may not have gone to Joe Biden. If Donald Trump’s alleged sortie with Stormy Daniels would have influenced voters, perhaps Hunter’s obscene behaviors – and ties to Ukrainian interests – would have undermined Joe Biden’s credibility. […]
— Read More: granitegrok.com